Wisconsin REALTORS® Association Page 6 Legal Update, November 2018
Code of Ethics
Article 3 of the Code of Ethics establishes the principal of cooperation,
which is the bedrock of relationships between REALTORS®: “REALTORS®
shall cooperate with other brokers except when cooperation is not in
the client’s best interest. The obligation to cooperate does not include
the obligation to share commissions, fees, or to otherwise compensate
another broker. (Amended 1/95)”
The Code of Ethics Standard of Practice 3-1 indicates that while
cooperation may often be offered, a REALTOR® cannot assume that this
automatically includes an offer of compensation:
Compensation Agreements
Standing bilateral policy letters are often used to create long-term
cooperation and compensation agreements, while other compensation
agreements generally are used for a single transaction. The new WRA
Compensation Agreement form is structured to be a single transaction
compensation agreement although it could be modified to have a
broader application if desired.
A broker’s compensation agreement may be used in many different
situations:
• It may be used in commercial transactions where the properties are
not listed in any MLS or similar service establishing cooperation and
compensation. Commercial firms sometimes proceed based on a
handshake or an assumed understanding of commission, but the best
protection is to have a written compensation agreement stating the
commission percentage/amount and what must be done to earn it.
• When the property is located in a geographic area not within the
jurisdiction of an MLS, a compensation agreement will be desirable.
Without the MLS firms have to create their own agreements regarding
cooperation, what the commission will be and how it is earned. There
is no automatic “safety net” establishing those elements.
• Where one of the firms is not an MLS participant, a written
compensation agreement is ideal for filling in the blanks for the non-
MLS firm. The offer of cooperation and compensation in the MLS is
made only to other MLS participants, so if the cooperating firm is
not an MLS participant then a separate written agreement regarding
commission and performance standards is needed. That agreement
may, if desired, replicate what was offered in the MLS and offer the
same terms to the non-MLS participant.
• Where the MLS offer of compensation has been rejected because the
firms want to negotiate compensation different than what is in the MLS,
a written compensation agreement fills in the gap. If the cooperating
firm is rejecting the compensation offered by the listing firm, that is
best communicated directly between the two brokers. Sometimes
there is a tendency to recite this fact in an offer, which certainly serves
to notify the parties, but the offer is a contract between the buyer
and the seller, so a communication between brokers is better made
directly between them in an email or other written correspondence. It
may be advisable to affirmatively state that the agreed commission or
fee is in place of, and not in addition to, any compensation offered in
the MLS or elsewhere.
With respect to a compensation agreement, the only necessary
parties are the listing firm and the cooperating firm. The seller and the
buyer might, however, acknowledge this agreement for the purpose of
consenting to a buyer’s broker receipt of compensation from someone
other than the client if that consent has not already been given elsewhere.
This is necessary for compliance with Wis. Admin. Code § REEB 24.05(1).
A broker’s compensation agreement should indicate that the listing
firm is offering cooperation and compensation, and that the cooperating
firm is accepting this offer. The agreement may also indicate whether
cooperation is extended via a subagency relationship or buyer brokerage.
Members may wish to enlist the assistance of their company attorney
to develop a compensation agreement format appropriate to the firm’s
marketplace and transactions. A compensation agreement should:
1. Describe or identify the property,
2. Name the parties,
P3P6
question to be determined by an arbitration hearing panel based
on all relevant facts and circumstances including, but not limited
to, why it was impossible or financially unfeasible for the listing
broker to collect some or all of the commission established in
the listing agreement; at what point in the transaction did the
listing broker know (or should have known) that some or all of
the commission established in the listing agreement might not
be paid; and how promptly had the listing broker communicated
to cooperating brokers that the commission established in the
listing agreement might not be paid.
The multiple listing service shall not have a rule requiring
the listing broker to disclose the amount of total negotiated
commission in his listing contract, and the multiple listing
service shall not publish the total negotiated commission on a
listing which has been submitted to the MLS by a participant.
The multiple listing service shall not disclose in any way the total
commission negotiated between the seller and the listing broker.
Note 1: The compensation specified on listings filed with the
multiple listing service by the participants of the service shall be
expressed as a percentage of the gross sales price or as a definite
dollar amount. Multiple listing services may, as a matter of local
discretion, allow participants to offer cooperative compensation
as a percentage of the net sales price, with net sales price defined
as the gross sales price minus buyer upgrades (new construction)
and seller concessions (as defined by the MLS unless otherwise
defined by state law or regulation). The essential and appropriate
requirement by a multiple listing service is that the information
to be published shall clearly inform the participants as to the
compensation they will receive in cooperative transactions unless
advised otherwise by the listing broker in writing in advance of
their submitting an offer to purchase.
Multiple listing services shall not publish listings that do not
include an offer of compensation expressed as a percentage
of the gross selling price or as a definite dollar amount, nor
shall they include general invitations by listing brokers to
other participants to discuss terms and conditions of possible
cooperative relationships.
REALTORS®, acting as exclusive agents or brokers of sellers/
landlords, establish the terms and conditions of offers to
cooperate. Unless expressly indicated in offers to cooperate,
cooperating brokers may not assume that the offer of cooperation
includes an offer of compensation. Terms of compensation, if any,
shall be ascertained by cooperating brokers before beginning
efforts to accept the offer of cooperation. (Amended 1/99)